Presentation Type

Poster Presentation

Abstract

This poster presents a statistical analysis of a research project studying the impact of humanitarian engineering projects (HEPs) on the views of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). The authors aim to investigate the deeper effects of HEPs across engineering students, alumni, and professionals. Data from participants were gathered through a survey, using both qualitative and quantitative methods, to assess participants’ attitudes toward DEI in engineering.

The survey included two instruments: the Engineering Professional Responsibility Assessment (EPRA) and the Views on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Engineering (VDEIE). The EPRA measured participants’ perspectives on professional responsibility, while the VDEIE focused on assessing their views and attitudes toward inclusive behaviors. The responses were recorded using a Likert scale, allowing for statistical analysis of significant differences within the data.

To analyze group differences, the authors categorized the participants into majority (White and Asian males) and minority (non-White/non-Asian males and all females) groups, based on underrepresented demographics in engineering. Comparisons were conducted between the two subgroups within each primary group—students, alumni, and professionals—as well as across the combined groups. Findings revealed that the only significant difference in attitudes occurred among the student subgroups. In contrast, no significant differences were seen between the alumni and professional groups. The authors suggest that factors such as age, maturity, and team experiences may have contributed to the differences between students, alumni, and professionals.

Faculty Mentor

Dr. Kirsten Dodson

Share

COinS
 

Investigating the Impact of Humanitarian Engineering Projects Across Demographic Groups

This poster presents a statistical analysis of a research project studying the impact of humanitarian engineering projects (HEPs) on the views of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). The authors aim to investigate the deeper effects of HEPs across engineering students, alumni, and professionals. Data from participants were gathered through a survey, using both qualitative and quantitative methods, to assess participants’ attitudes toward DEI in engineering.

The survey included two instruments: the Engineering Professional Responsibility Assessment (EPRA) and the Views on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Engineering (VDEIE). The EPRA measured participants’ perspectives on professional responsibility, while the VDEIE focused on assessing their views and attitudes toward inclusive behaviors. The responses were recorded using a Likert scale, allowing for statistical analysis of significant differences within the data.

To analyze group differences, the authors categorized the participants into majority (White and Asian males) and minority (non-White/non-Asian males and all females) groups, based on underrepresented demographics in engineering. Comparisons were conducted between the two subgroups within each primary group—students, alumni, and professionals—as well as across the combined groups. Findings revealed that the only significant difference in attitudes occurred among the student subgroups. In contrast, no significant differences were seen between the alumni and professional groups. The authors suggest that factors such as age, maturity, and team experiences may have contributed to the differences between students, alumni, and professionals.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.